Jordan Peterson: “There was plenty of motivation to take me out. It just didn't work" | British GQ
As part of our 30th-anniversary dissection of masculinity, Helen Lewis interviews controversial Canadian academic and bestselling author Jordan Peterson about the patriarchy, the alt-right, gay parenting, fascist ideologies, his all-beef diet and much more...
Subscribe to British GQ►► bit.ly/BritishGQSubscribe
CONNECT WITH BRITISH GQ
Web: bit.ly/HomepageBritishGQ
Twitter: bit.ly/TwitterBritishGQ
Facebook: bit.ly/FacebookBritishGQ
Instagram: bit.ly/InstagramBritishGQ
Newsletter: bit.ly/NewsletterBritishGQ
Photographer: Nigel Parry
ABOUT BRITISH GQ
British GQ is the premier channel for men’s style, lifestyle and entertainment. Every week brand new series, original documentaries and essential style guides make it the first port of call for living well and looking good for men.
Jordan Peterson: “There was plenty of motivation to take me out. It just didn't work"
dehave.info
She brought up "Pepe", because she, like all Liberals : FEAR Q
Nazis were left wing radical socialist !
I’m not even giving you 15 minutes
Mad how many times she subtly tries to put words in his mouth, yet he never does it, not even once.
If you get to the end you notice he just gives up explaining himself because she just doesn't listen
bruh notice how she has an entire book of facts and can't even get a single edge on him the entire conversation
the stranger 2 months ago 52:47 There is a visible edit-cut here. Vote this up so people recognize they removed his response.
She is clearly out of her depth. His knowledge overcame her feminism. No woman deserves a step up based on non factual evidence. She(clearly tying to expand her vision). He, draw cartoons while answering serous questions. My most valuable man alive. Mentally intellect. Prepared for every dumb question......... desfoyed This uneducated femanist. Sjws......‘you are in my radar.......and I’ll crush you verbally.’
The way she keeps fidgeting with her hands shows her defeat.
She’s the smug one
She’s a fool
Jordan owned her
Sorry, evolution is a hoax !
1:41:22 The best answer of the session.
1:39:34 "What has your all beef diet done for you" . . . . JP lists off all the benefits he's experienced. "I imagine your arteries might not be in great shape", she says with her double chin wobbling. I imagine they are in MUCH better shape than yours, missy, even though he's twice your age.
They are both extremely witty and smart. Jordan points just hit slightly harder.
She is difficult to listen to.🤦♀️ The issue is that the Lord established order and authority and she does not like it. But-we all naturally need structure and it is not a matter of devaluing anyone, but a form of effective functioning.
Killing/aborting babies up to 9 months and leaving survivors without medical care is absolutely HORRIFIC!!!
Women with brown skin don't flush red. So what then?
I actually like this guy.
How far into this interview do you think she thought to herself..... AAAHHHHH WHAT HAVE I DONE???
substandard vs. commonsense
She actually dominated herself.
Kinda hot Dr...
Remarkable use of sheer logic against a bunch of prejudices and cheap slogans.
52:37 Dr. Peterson's response is removed.
18:00 🤣 that was great.
its foolish to think, "civilization has peaked....its all upwards from here" 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️ you don't say
I love how looking back it's so obvious that he is totally deluded by a severe benzo addiction.
His benzo addiction began after this....so what are you talking about?
Universities clone this "Femspeak" by granting "Degrees" to silly people.
I love this guy!
I love how he proves her wrong!
You know, you never see a hot feminist do ya?
I slept 12 hours last night and this is helping me get tired so i can sleep , thank you smart man and chair lady.
41:15 He doesn't mess around
Only a small fraction of men can dominate, the rest are deemed as losers by society
When she observes that 95% of men are the ones suffering? "Some women suffer". When she is reminded men provided 95% of the benefits women enjoy? "Men did some nice things". Then: "Isn't that pessimistic?" (as she throws around 1900% factors of bias).
both serve the same bosses and both shills. way of the world has a video exposing Peterson on bitchute
Can you link it?
That smug smirk she constantly wears, as if she thinks she knows more and is smarter than her guest, is nauseating.
This lady is the worst lol
I just want to point out how fantastic she was as an interviewer, which is something I think this comment section is missing. She acted as the voice of the opposing opinion with passion, and let him speak his side. Cant ask for more. This would have been a very boring interview if he was talking to someone that agreed on him with every point. For those bashing her: can you imagine trying to argue the opposite opinion against this guy for over an hour straight?
What does Jordan say at 1:01:57?
Knowledge-based backhanded “slaps” falling from the skies for this lady 😅
You know as much flak as this lady appears to be getting (from my understanding) she seems to be quite rational and respectful polite in her presentation and interview with Jordan Peterson. She doesn't try to put too many words in his mouth, she allows him to continue his train of thought and finish his points rather than butting in rudely and abruptly as I've seen many other journalists do, and ultimately she doesn't appear to allow any potential emotional response to manifest itself during the interview. Overall very respectful and professional, I appreciate that.
She was far more professional than Peterson.
when a feminist meet logic:
She really tryna nitpick and can't answer half the things he's asked. Also how is wanting to look good and be with your family a feminine thing?
I didn’t realize men were still allowed to give women spankings against their will, but I’ll be darned if he didn’t turn her right over his knee and chap her cheeks for the whole interview. Is that “the patriarchy?”
This whole interview was not entertaining or productive until about an hour in, when they found common ground on one issue.
In America, this journalist, is just that one interviewer from the UK who tried to punch above her intellectual weight and lost terribly. Has she moved past that to the rest of the world?
She destroyed him. Poor Jordan.
She just called us neanderthals.
He's to clever for silly interview questions..
Love that this guy speaks up... for logic, for sensibility, against socialism, for... the rest of us.
Peterson had logic? Like where?
Who's the audio person on this? Helen is too loud and Jordan is so quiet and gain-y that it sounds like he's in another room.
This women is sooooo cringe
Jordan Peterson is only controversial to morons or people who aren't familiar with his work.
I wouldn't call him controversial, just a self absorbed fake intellectual.
Hilarious conversation super high IQ very well-educated person have the conversation with somebody who's full of opinions and feminism
Helen was smarter and more professional.
She is such an evil hypocrite.
Okay, but...Okay, but... Okay, but... NOT OKAY BUT!
I like both of them💕😌
Stable genius. President of USA please.
I hate this broad so much... someone should tell her talking fast doesn't mean your smart.
Hey 2020 is calling and he was right about the universities (14:15 - 15:10)
but hows that foundation work when the government turns your home into your prison? He didnt see this globalist twist coming thats for sure.
Let's spare a thought for her husband. May the Lord have mercy upon his soul.
Last name’s connect lineage. Simple.
17:38 her job is an unearned privilege? So much stuff is going over her head she might want to stand up
At 42:00 JP says that scientists recognize there is biological and behavioral continuity between humans and animals...Uh yea sure Jordan. But what third grader does not already know that? 'Which is why I chose lobsters...The reason I made that argument was to put paid at least in to part the absurd Marxist proposition that hierarchical structures are a secondary consequence of free market economies which is as preposterous a theory as you can have about anything...' [Really Jordan? As preposterous a theory as you can have about anything? Remember in the John Anderson interview when you said that the West is an oppressive patriarchy? Remember in the Full Oxford interview when you said that capitalism creates hierarchies where most people stack up at the bottom. Here is a more preposterous theory: Why does anyone think you are some kind of insightful intellectual?] At 44:00 Helen: your belief that lobsters say the thing you want to talk about Marxist ideology... JP: How do lobsters say that? [What Jordan, you just explained how lobsters address Marxism two minutes ago.] Let's punch in to Dr. God Complex at like 20:00. 'What if the patriarchy is composed mostly of women is it still a patriarchy? If it is a structure that is composed mostly of women then it is also a tyrannical patriarchy? So how do we get something that isn't a tyrannical patriarchy? So if it's 50/50 then its not a tyrannical patriarchy? So you think the hallmark of a tyrannical structure is the predominance of one gender? [Notice that Peterson uses the 'So you are saying...' trick from Cathy Newman. So you are saying if it is composed of women it is still a patriarchy? So you are saying if it is 50/50 then it is not a tyrannical patriarchy? No Jordan, she didn't say any of those things. She corrected your error that 'composed of mostly women would be a patriarchy'...that's matriarchy dude, you are welcome. And aren't you a little embarrassed with your condescending tone her, talking down to Helen like she is a four year old who didn't put away her toys properly?] I swear if JP says tyrannical patriarchy one more time as his made up smart guy term, I am going to stick pins in my voodoo doll of him, and dress him up in a T-shirt that says 'I heart post modern neo Marxists.]
My god when he said "everybody lies" he could not have emulated Dr. House more vividly. Amazing
When JP says “goodluck with that”, you’re irredeemable.
She really thinks she knows more stuff than an ex Harvard professor 🤣
She’s literally full of sh&t.
She said pass it on to the Neanderthals wow
Agree with most comments that he basically lead the whole interview but we should give props to her as well because the questions that she asked produced the most amazing answers that ive heard from Jordan , this interview is amazing because and most of all thanks to both participants, its trully one of the best interviews with this gem of our generation, Jordan
@jerry greene basically the whole interview ahahaha
Amazing answer? Like where?
She jumps from the frying pan into the fire in every argument. She needs to think before she speaks. I will not be buying her book.
this lady is highly moral and idealistic. that said, she is not rational , logical or empathetic at all... nor is she grounded in physical reality. shes miserable.
she think 5th judge being anti-abortion means we are going towards persecution of women? More than anything, being anti-abortion helps... because less women die as a result...
If she doesn't get that "over the top" mugshot off her face i am gonna slap her feminist looking face in that wall
Well poised and graceful. His debate style is refreshing. He absolutely owns her too.
you guys are WEAK
These are the kind of women who say "where have all the good men gone" who espouse these anti male anti masculinity views who want men to not be men that no man with half a brain would wanna be with to begin with. They subscribe to these ideas out of their own insecurities, if your not insecure about your femininity then neither shall a man feel like he has to restrict or restrain his natural biological masculine traits.
This man is amazing.
1:42 hours of master class for the progressive journalist
At 42:00 JP says that scientists recognize there is biological and behavioral continuity between humans and animals...Uh yea sure Jordan. But what third grader does not already know that? 'Which is why I chose lobsters...The reason I made that argument was to put paid at least in to part the absurd Marxist proposition that hierarchical structures are a secondary consequence of free market economies which is as preposterous a theory as you can have about anything...' [Really Jordan? As preposterous a theory as you can have about anything? Remember in the John Anderson interview when you said that the West is an oppressive patriarchy? Remember in the Full Oxford interview when you said that capitalism creates hierarchies where most people stack up at the bottom. Here is a more preposterous theory: Why does anyone think you are some kind of insightful intellectual?] At 44:00 Helen: your belief that lobsters say the thing you want to talk about Marxist ideology... JP: How do lobsters say that? [What Jordan, you just explained how lobsters address Marxism two minutes ago.] Let's punch in to Dr. God Complex at like 20:00. 'What if the patriarchy is composed mostly of women is it still a patriarchy? If it is a structure that is composed mostly of women then it is also a tyrannical patriarchy? So how do we get something that isn't a tyrannical patriarchy? So if it's 50/50 then its not a tyrannical patriarchy? So you think the hallmark of a tyrannical structure is the predominance of one gender? [Notice that Peterson uses the 'So you are saying...' trick from Cathy Newman. So you are saying if it is composed of women it is still a patriarchy? So you are saying if it is 50/50 then it is not a tyrannical patriarchy? No Jordan, she didn't say any of those things. She corrected your error that 'composed of mostly women would be a patriarchy'...that's matriarchy dude, you are welcome. And aren't you a little embarrassed with your condescending tone her, talking down to Helen like she is a four year old who didn't put away her toys properly?] I swear if JP says tyrannical patriarchy one more time as his made up smart guy term, I am going to stick pins in my voodoo doll of him, and dress him up in a T-shirt that says 'I heart post modern neo Marxists.]
She can’t get under his skin and she tries SO hard haha
Lordy, she’s in completely over her head.
People in this comment section are too harsh on her. I’m a huge Peterson fan and I think he’s right in most cases during this debate but honestly compare her performance to Cathy Newman and you realise that she’s far more intelligent and competent in debates.
I feel the exact same way. She did get annoying here and there but at least she was giving him something he could talk through and didn't interrupt him. I'm also a huge Peterson fan as well.
Who married this "woman"????
A seemingly sexist woman vs a honest non-biased man
And the "Alt Right" turned out to be right despite everyone appeasing the left bt disavowing everyone to the right of them.
She is a fool ,how do people live there life’s behind these ideas.???
Great conversation!
This dude is rascist and you all are rascist too
How about the gratitude owed to generations of women who gave birth to , nurtured and loved generations of children. The mother’s sacrifice!
JP has stated he was much more impatient during this interview than he would have liked, and so he considered not doing interviews after this. I can tell. However, he also said she was hostile the second she met him, even before the interview started. That's a shame. This man is probably the most misunderstood at this point, and the interviewer doesn't seem interested in finding out who he is, but rather, projecting all she finds wrong in the world on to him.
The english accent makes me sick. The un woke should come to Australia so we can take over and make a conservative bastion.
They are very intelligent. She might be very ridiculous and thanks to Peterson for the exposure but they seem to be too fast for my slow brain.
Pater Familus
I think he let himself down on the argument about violence. Personally I would think the progression of the human race relies on the eradication of violence and all weaponry. Yes, I am serious. Why not? We have no use for violence or weapons, they are what degrades us the most.
AYOOO MY MAN JORDAN
Poor jordan has been living that A beautiful mind life
She's actually really smart and they got along very well
You can leave.