Starship | SN10 | High-Altitude Flight Test

3 Mär 2021
8 435 960 Aufrufe

On Wednesday, March 3, Starship serial number (SN10) successfully completed SpaceX’s third high-altitude flight test of a Starship prototype from our site in Cameron County, Texas.
Similar to the high-altitude flight tests of Starship SN8 and SN9, SN10 was powered through ascent by three Raptor engines, each shutting down in sequence prior to the vehicle reaching apogee - approximately 10 km in altitude. SN10 performed a propellant transition to the internal header tanks, which hold landing propellant, before reorienting itself for reentry and a controlled aerodynamic descent.

The Starship prototype descended under active aerodynamic control, accomplished by independent movement of two forward and two aft flaps on the vehicle. All four flaps were actuated by an onboard flight computer to control Starship’s attitude during flight and enabled a precise landing at the intended location. SN10’s Raptor engines reignited as the vehicle performed the landing flip maneuver immediately before successfully touching down on the landing pad!
As if the flight test was not exciting enough, SN10 experienced a rapid unscheduled disassembly shortly after landing. These test flights are all about improving our understanding and development of a fully reusable transportation system designed to carry both crew and cargo on long-duration interplanetary flights, and help humanity return to the Moon, and travel to Mars and beyond.

  • Заебись мультфильм...

    Серж ВладимирскийСерж ВладимирскийVor Stunde
  • beautiful CGI

    Live TuberLive TuberVor 3 Stunden
  • spaceX

    Brien DunphyBrien DunphyVor 4 Stunden
  • wach sorry

    Brien DunphyBrien DunphyVor 4 Stunden
  • Flying Squid

    iql dnriql dnrVor 4 Stunden
  • I think Elon musk did the the biggest bottle flip in juman history

    Alexander PerdomoAlexander PerdomoVor 7 Stunden
    • Human history

      Alexander PerdomoAlexander PerdomoVor 7 Stunden

    Buğra Çağrı YURTBuğra Çağrı YURTVor Tag
  • announcer sounds like a dude from the early 1950's

    lifefunseeker todaylifefunseeker todayVor Tag
  • " If it doesn't look like a duck, swim like a duck, and quack like a duck, then it probably isn't a duck "

    [[[] S c o t b o X []]][[[] S c o t b o X []]]Vor Tag
  • oyes desde el segundo 40 al 30 dice hay falla en el sistema

    Jimmy B. Perez LopezJimmy B. Perez LopezVor Tag
  • The dislikes are from aliens

    rbxlessrbxlessVor Tag
  • Focusnici blin

    Андрей КаАндрей КаVor Tag
  • Me: shows off my laggy big thicc redstone rocket in random Minecraft creative worlds What I see 5:43

    LeEpicPlayz BaconLeEpicPlayz BaconVor 2 Tage
  • So finally that attack is rebugged for enslavement of attackers pilots and defense missiles to aoid future outfalls...

    Elias OhmElias OhmVor 2 Tage
  • 1:11 sn9 moment 1:31 sn8 moment

    LoparceGaming826LoparceGaming826Vor 2 Tage
  • gg

    PrimeIXPrimeIXVor 3 Tage
  • 👍👽

    Виталий ЛукашинВиталий ЛукашинVor 3 Tage
  • It's so. incredibly. loud. WOw!

    emmmemmmVor 3 Tage
  • Amazing job!

    Heybar SequeraHeybar SequeraVor 3 Tage
  • Was that real footage or CGI interspersed with real footage?

    stringsnarestringsnareVor 4 Tage
    • Real footage, all the way through. It was a livestream.

      alexn310alexn310Vor 3 Tage
  • 11:42 The best most unbelievable non CGI part of the video. Truly amazing shot

  • MUY BUENO- UN ABRAZO Y UN BESO GORDO- El video mio se encuentra en el YOU TUBE y se llama- robotizado con cd 4017 , ne 555 pilotos El plano esta bajo el video. Andre Troll Kaiser

    andre trollandre trollVor 6 Tage
  • Wow! I thankyou but i think the landing was far more astounding than the take off. Fantastic👍👍👍

    Frank TuckwellFrank TuckwellVor 6 Tage
  • 11:41 Looks like one of those movie scenes.

    Glitched BloxGlitched BloxVor 6 Tage
  • Huge Respect for the Engineers, technicians and every worker at SpaceX 🙏💯.

    bcvbb hyuibcvbb hyuiVor 6 Tage
  • Es una nave de Flash Gordon, OMG!

    moises gonzalesmoises gonzalesVor 6 Tage
  • Cortaram a parte da explosão pq? HUAUHAUHHAUUH medo de cair ações elon musk?

    Caio PortellaCaio PortellaVor 6 Tage
  • amazing..

    onemaxlightonemaxlightVor 6 Tage
  • For a moment, it looked CGI.

    ICOD73ICOD73Vor 7 Tage
    • I watched this with my own eyes. 100% not CGI.

      Alex HendrixAlex HendrixVor 5 Tage
    • Nice

      bcvbb hyuibcvbb hyuiVor 6 Tage
  • The reduced vibration of this missile is an unparalleled precedent

    Ailsa NiAilsa NiVor 7 Tage
  • Man will go mars no earlier than 2040. Even a small cybertruck takes years to be released to public, I can't imagine how long it will take starship to meet all the requirements. Probably decades. The news says we will see Man on mars very soon, just to keep us high expectations, but I think it's just marketing. I'm just being realistic.

    Igor Delta F.Igor Delta F.Vor 7 Tage
    • I wrote the wrong number of days. It's +400 to 500 days. Yet not for this decade. It's just my opinion, I hope I'm wrong. Thank you Matt for remind me to correct the days. Mr. Lmao, sorry to challenge your beliefs, if you don't agree write why you don't, instead of going straight to offensive words.

      Igor Delta F.Igor Delta F.Vor Tag
    • @Lmao. My bad, I'll delete my response

      Matt's Youtube stuffMatt's Youtube stuffVor Tag
    • @Matt's DEhave stuff i was referring to the original comment

      Lmao.Lmao.Vor Tag
    • so is this "argument" just some copy paste shit or are you part of a hivemind? i've seen this exact comment several times now.

      Lmao.Lmao.Vor Tag
    • @Igor Delta F. I'm not sure where you get 1400 days from. During the closest approach, Mars is about a 6-9 month journey depending on which year you launch. That is maximum ~270 days trip one way to Mars. Perhaps you can be more specific on where you are getting your numbers from

      Matt's Youtube stuffMatt's Youtube stuffVor 2 Tage
  • So Elon is iron man because that seems a lot like how iron man lands 😄👀

    little Phoenix33little Phoenix33Vor 7 Tage
  • happen live 😂

    vbddfy euuytvbddfy euuytVor 8 Tage
    • @Ailsa Ni what

      Cleanrial and Tronnzy - RobloxCleanrial and Tronnzy - RobloxVor 6 Tage
    • Демократия не долетит до Марса.

      Ailsa NiAilsa NiVor 7 Tage
  • did anyone else notice the hard bounce on landing or the drone view that looked like a cheap netflix movie?

    Wayne DavisWayne DavisVor 8 Tage
  • hi mates is very enjoy...blazz_zzzz

    Olavo NevesOlavo NevesVor 8 Tage
  • congratulations

    SadSmileTVSadSmileTVVor 8 Tage
  • What a bunch a shit! Can't believe y'all into this crap, CGI at the end got me cracking, no craft can do that TODAY , c'mon guys wake the fuck up

    JP muroJP muroVor 8 Tage
    • @JP muro I have shown you multiple videos captured by amateurs, yet you still insist on cgi? What's your proof of CGI?

      alexn310alexn310Vor 3 Tage
    • @JP muro (That was SN11 the twitter pic, the links are SN10)

      alexn310alexn310Vor 3 Tage
    • @JP muro Well sure since that was filmed before the launch, lemme find you an amateur video of it. Theres also RGV Aerial Photography, and after the bellyflop Fail of SN11 they photgraphed it's nosecone laying on the ground im gonna get you some links.

      alexn310alexn310Vor 3 Tage
    • The real question lies beyond you and me and what we both think. Theres proof , that this is all a hoax. The question is why are you defending something that you can't prove, while all claims against what your trying to cling to have tons of facts , scientific, to back them up. My proof is right there , the cgi sequence at the end and the so called landing, i know its hard. We both have our own truths and i respect that, its just that's this is soo in our faces , its impossible not to see. And question its nature

      JP muroJP muroVor 3 Tage
    • We'll , yes , i see it. It never took off. Did it? i mean i could go there tomorrow and take a pic, what's your proof? Where's the footage of take off and descent.

      JP muroJP muroVor 3 Tage
  • Modern warfare CGI looks way better , should give em a call #elonmusk

    JP muroJP muroVor 8 Tage
    • Go to boca chica

      Cleanrial and Tronnzy - RobloxCleanrial and Tronnzy - RobloxVor 6 Tage
    • looks like a sci fi film

      vbddfy euuytvbddfy euuytVor 8 Tage
  • Alles nur lüge

    Björn der SachseBjörn der SachseVor 9 Tage
    • Jede Person mit einem Donald Trump Profilbild hat still zu sein

      Volksgenosse Erich HoneckerVolksgenosse Erich HoneckerVor 8 Tage
    • Go there yourself and see it for yourself

      alexn310alexn310Vor 8 Tage
  • This style of aircraft- is it "Flash Gordon" style? Or more Rocketeer?

    Andy HarrisonAndy HarrisonVor 9 Tage
  • nice cgi

    shark2vshark2vVor 9 Tage
    • Go to boca chica

      Cleanrial and Tronnzy - RobloxCleanrial and Tronnzy - RobloxVor 6 Tage
    • You can go there yourself and see it

      alexn310alexn310Vor 9 Tage
  • Is this even real? It looks like cgi

    John McGrathJohn McGrathVor 10 Tage
    • yeah, its because it is

      Juan Pablo MuroJuan Pablo MuroVor 3 Tage
    • @alexn310 ye

      KELOO JBL ッKELOO JBL ッVor 8 Tage
    • Go to Boca Chica, TX. You can see these getting built and flown in real time there.

      alexn310alexn310Vor 9 Tage
  • Nice

    Lexi TalksLexi TalksVor 10 Tage
  • ไอ้ควายน็อตบอกแผนทุกอย่างองค์กรNASA มีแผนอยากเป็นเบอร์1ของสหรัฐ.แล้วจะกลับไปใช้สถานีอวกาศสกดจิตทุกพรรคในสหรัฐ. ให้สนับสนุนเงินงบประมาณและมีตัวแทนNASA ที่หวังลงชิงต่ำแหน่งประธานาธิบดีสหรัฐ.ในสมัยต่อไป

    แก่ง นางแก่ง นางVor 10 Tage
  • NASA กลายเป็นควายเมื่อถูกจับได้ว่าใ้ดาวเทียม และใช้สถานทีอวกาศทดลองมนุษย์ แต่สู้ความคิดมนุษย์ไม่ได้ โดยล่าสุดมีการเปิดเผย ชื่อบอร์ดผู้สั่งให้มนุษย์อวกาศบนสถานีอวกาศทำงานนี้

    แก่ง นางแก่ง นางVor 10 Tage
  • 12:00 I see starhopper

    Dave TimothyDave TimothyVor 10 Tage
    • ye love starhopper

      KELOO JBL ッKELOO JBL ッVor 8 Tage
  • What I don’t like about the BFR is that there is no redundancy. Since fuel tanks are located in the nose cone, the crew cannot jettison from the top to escape an inevitable failure. Any manned flights must have redundancy.

    Saanichton MinistriesSaanichton MinistriesVor 10 Tage
    • @Saanichton Ministries I agree ...,.. I don’t see nasa trusting SpaceX to place astronauts on Mars anytime soon until starship has at least 200-600 successful flights without incidence along with a smart AI to pilot starship However SpaceX does have falcon Heavy which is a proven space vehicle which I do see NASA trusting to send to the moon or Mars 🥲 Only the future will tell

      Eduardo Rodriguez VazquezEduardo Rodriguez VazquezVor 9 Tage
    • @Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez fair enough. After a study of the STS program, it would be a nightmare to fly on a rocket. As a pilot myself, it is fascinating science. But way too risky. I don’t ever see the risk factor going away. Man it too flawed. Too much can go wrong in manned space flight. Too many extremes. I don’t know if it is ethical watching people kill themselves trying to go to Mars.... like the Mars one project?

      Saanichton MinistriesSaanichton MinistriesVor 9 Tage
    • @Saanichton Ministries Is this suppose be hyperbole ....? Obviously not, they only flow 4 of them🤦🏻and their still very much prototype rockets That’s the equivalence of me asking you if you’d like a flight on the wrights brothers first plane .....

      Eduardo Rodriguez VazquezEduardo Rodriguez VazquezVor 9 Tage
    • @Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez would you if you could?

      Saanichton MinistriesSaanichton MinistriesVor 9 Tage
    • @Saanichton Ministries 🤨 ....... no I don’t

      Eduardo Rodriguez VazquezEduardo Rodriguez VazquezVor 9 Tage
  • Демократия не долетит до Марса.

    Денис ПетинДенис ПетинVor 10 Tage
  • bravo let's Mars but if Mars gravity is lower than Earth it's going to be easy landing

    Pascal FokxPascal FokxVor 10 Tage
    • ouais

      KELOO JBL ッKELOO JBL ッVor 8 Tage
  • FIREBALL XL5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • looks like a sci fi film

    vince mmvince mmVor 11 Tage
    • ye but is real

      KELOO JBL ッKELOO JBL ッVor 8 Tage
  • That is bull shit.

    Carmen A. CabelloCarmen A. CabelloVor 11 Tage
    • @Shorty haha

      It’s grantIt’s grantVor 8 Tage
    • Carmen is close to karen

      ShortyShortyVor 9 Tage
    • @alexn310 thanks for saving me time

      It’s grantIt’s grantVor 10 Tage
    • Go and watch it yourself in boca chica before throwing bullshit accusations on DEhave

      alexn310alexn310Vor 10 Tage
  • 24 7 live Mars cam coming soon : )

    Nebula DustNebula DustVor 11 Tage
  • Congrats, the best sci fi movie ever... it's incredible...

    collilab laboratorio visivocollilab laboratorio visivoVor 11 Tage
  • Большая консервная банка с крыльями и двигателями..круто..поздравляю. Она еще и садиться..супер..

    Константин ГолубятниковКонстантин ГолубятниковVor 11 Tage
  • I like how they cut out where it exploded anyway. Scrub X blew it again. At least they are consistent.

    Jephro321Jephro321Vor 11 Tage
    • They didn't cut anything out. The livestream ended shortly after landing. The explosion happened approx 7/8 minutes later

      Matt's Youtube stuffMatt's Youtube stuffVor 2 Tage
    • Did you even seen the live stream?

      K4!T3NK4!T3NVor 6 Tage
    • This is the testing stage it's normal for things to blow up.

      6969Vor 6 Tage
    • @Jephro321 Was saying no to you stating they cut it out. Yes it exploded, but they didnt "cut it out" they ended the stream before it exploded.

      alexn310alexn310Vor 10 Tage
    • @alexn310 no what it blew up period.

      Jephro321Jephro321Vor 10 Tage
  • launch pad is too close to the installations ! dangerous

    gilbondfacgilbondfacVor 12 Tage
  • When landing, the ignition is too late to correct. It needs to be 1-2 seconds earlier.The liquid fuel bunker should be divided into many small bunkers. Otherwise, if the whole bunker is turned vertically to horizontal, and then to vertical, the kinetic energy of the liquid itself can heat itself, causing expansion and deflagration

    KK FFKK FFVor 12 Tage
    • @TimePro oh nvm I commented on this before I check Elon’s Tweet again I kinda didn’t remember the case

      Epic gamer Heap1Epic gamer Heap1Vor 5 Tage
    • @Epic gamer Heap1 Starship DOES use helium. After SN8s crash helium was put into the header tank of SN9 and SN10 to keep the tank pressurized and to prevent what happened to SN8. The helium was not supposed to be ingested.

      TimeProTimeProVor 5 Tage
    • @TimePro An Starship does not have helium it only uses lox, methane fuel and pressure.

      Epic gamer Heap1Epic gamer Heap1Vor 5 Tage
    • @Epic gamer Heap1 That would be the case for SN8. SN10 has a hard landing because it ingested helium unexpectedly.

      TimeProTimeProVor 7 Tage
    • It is not late according to Elon the single raptor engine was low on thrust to due low pressure inside of one of the tanks

      Epic gamer Heap1Epic gamer Heap1Vor 7 Tage
  • Вероятно, данная труба должна изображать носитель? Труба еле-еле взобралась на высоту 2 км и опустилась на землю. Как она собирается разогнать полезный груз до необходимой скорости? Это просто лапша для неграмотных.

    Dolores IzabellaDolores IzabellaVor 12 Tage
  • Need to add a parachute placed on top of the missile, when it falls straight. Need to improve the landing cooling system with the missile fixation axle after landing, I mean upgrading the yard system so that under it there is a shaft that can move and attach itself. as a landing gear. Maybe so, try using a flying parachute that cuts off when the Rocket is falling in mid-air. hm ... i think this idea can be sold, maybe n't 😄

    Huỳnh Đức LêHuỳnh Đức LêVor 12 Tage
    • @Huỳnh Đức Lê Please for the love of god stop calling it a missile!

      It’s grantIt’s grantVor 10 Tage
    • @Huỳnh Đức Lê Yes, but they've already demonstrated they can land it without, and a parachute would also increase turnaround time for reuse. No need for one if propulsive landing can already yield the requested results.

      alexn310alexn310Vor 10 Tage
    • @alexn310 I know it's heavy, I mean the parachute is only used for a short time and then cut off when the missile is horizontal, except that the missile is placed at the top of the missile retained at the upright position. The parachute flew horizontally should be two moderate instead of one large enough to bear the load since it would be cut off to enter the final stage anyway. Although mainly used to reduce the force and help more stability, the possibility of wind, the weather will adversely affect the parachute and affect the missile but this problem can be improved. which is that you can use three parachutes to change your posture from horizontal to straight if you cut the parachute from the tail of the Rocket.

      Huỳnh Đức LêHuỳnh Đức LêVor 10 Tage
    • Starship is too heavy for a parachute.

      alexn310alexn310Vor 10 Tage
  • what do you make of this: Take a look at the spaceX logo. (the actual logo). When I look at the logo SpaceX... I'm seeing: Spy.... then it says..... Cc .....(which in numerology is 33. Freemasons number). .... Then what looks like a symbol that appear to be something trying to 'break out of the dome". So that's one interpretation. Or another: Spa cex. Or in other words "Spa Sex". then the X in that looks like it could represent the act of sex (look carefully, it's crazy.) (boom-chic-a-waa-waa). Okay and a 3rd interpretation goes like this: SpaceX. Well "X" in english and internationally is a way of saying "No". So it's Space-NO. or in reverse: No Space. Which is pretty obvious these days. So those are 3 interpretations of the SpaceX LOGO.

    nice guynice guyVor 12 Tage
    • @nice guy I have no patience for people with special needs

      It’s grantIt’s grantVor 5 Tage
    • @69 no joke. All major corporate logos have something encoded.

      nice guynice guyVor 5 Tage
    • @It’s grant no joke. All major corporate logos have something encoded.

      nice guynice guyVor 5 Tage
    • @K4!T3N The rockets are a scam. The cars are turning out to be a scam. Everyone who's used PayPal for any length of time knows it's a complete scam. What has he turned out yet that's actually a quality product that's not a lie or a scam??? The car is one thing, because it's just a really really shitty car. But the rockets are total frauds. It's not space exploration. It's a fireworks company. People are so dumb they don't understand anything.

      nice guynice guyVor 5 Tage
    • You milking it??.... bruuuuuuhhhh

      K4!T3NK4!T3NVor 6 Tage
  • I think that the engineers made a mistake in constructing the "SN" rocket in that they practically limited the cooling of the "Raptor" engine. When the descent starts and the engines start, they start or do not work. Then air pressure is created which returns the heat to the "pot", so to speak. With Falcon rockets, the engines are free and they don't have that problem. One of the solutions is to drill holes in the lower part, next to the legs, or to line the engines with refractory material.

    Biljana Milinčić-BežanovićBiljana Milinčić-BežanovićVor 12 Tage
  • Did anybody see the paper clip to the right of screen

    hordes Coffeehordes CoffeeVor 13 Tage
    • ?????????? please show when?????????? U OK DUDE????????????

      It’s grantIt’s grantVor 10 Tage
  • Well done folks . Keep it up .

    Die KatzeDie KatzeVor 13 Tage
  • cgi did not improve much i guess..

    derms terderms terVor 13 Tage
    • @K4!T3N you speak like you came from there lol

      derms terderms terVor 6 Tage
    • @derms ter Go to boca chica, texas.... you're just lazy... lol

      K4!T3NK4!T3NVor 6 Tage
    • @derms ter Theirs no need...... theirs hundreds of videos of the landing .......

      Eduardo Rodriguez VazquezEduardo Rodriguez VazquezVor 9 Tage
    • @Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez you film the landing for me, i will believe

      derms terderms terVor 9 Tage
    • @derms ter Go to boca chica in the next 2-3 weeks for SN15..........Lets see if its CGI at that point :)

      Eduardo Rodriguez VazquezEduardo Rodriguez VazquezVor 10 Tage
  • team.

    bouytt guytbouytt guytVor 13 Tage
  • Оооо ес 🤑

    FinZdravFinZdravVor 13 Tage
  • Cool

    nothing is impossiblenothing is impossibleVor 13 Tage

      Aistis AukstikalnisAistis AukstikalnisVor 12 Tage
  • The mature pan practically observe because custard adventitiously refuse apud a unadvised captain. handy, dull black

    Ca SneaksCa SneaksVor 13 Tage
  • Eh 3 years left before the starship goes to Mars

    Jared Johanne AgustinJared Johanne AgustinVor 13 Tage
    • Comento : viendo lo bien me llama la atención la toma de este lanzamiento que alguien por favor me explique como se realizo esta toma que tipo de cámara se uso no se s

      bouytt guytbouytt guytVor 13 Tage
  • That.... was incredible!

    Ron GuadaRon GuadaVor 13 Tage
  • soooooo perfect

  • Release the onboard camera during descent so that we can see space at that altitude. Oh nevermind, it's still the decades long grammar why not

    dLedger XYZdLedger XYZVor 13 Tage
    • This flight went to 10km. If you want to 'see space at that altitude', whatever that means, you'd be better served by booking a flight on an airliner, as they can get up to 13km.

      Brent SmithBrent SmithVor 7 Tage
  • more tax payers money down the Shitter

    Boris WrongstonBoris WrongstonVor 13 Tage
    • Your probably more dependent on the government tax payers than SpaceX is.........Their a private space company :)

      Eduardo Rodriguez VazquezEduardo Rodriguez VazquezVor 10 Tage
    • It's a private company, no tax payers money

      Ethan RobertsEthan RobertsVor 13 Tage
  • The reduced vibration of this missile is an unparalleled precedent

    ceerw butyceerw butyVor 14 Tage
  • You are coming from the SN11 flight test yesterday. 😂

    Charalampos AvgenikosCharalampos AvgenikosVor 14 Tage
    • Yes 😭😭

      ForgeSkyGamingForgeSkyGamingVor 13 Tage
  • Это что то фантастическое

    Максим ПоскинМаксим ПоскинVor 14 Tage
  • The typical profit quantitatively scold because height formally mix notwithstanding a steadfast room. squeamish, incandescent net

    Peter ZhuPeter ZhuVor 14 Tage
  • the geniuses just keep showing off.. very impressive

    Daniel PerezDaniel PerezVor 14 Tage
    • Give it a few more minutes

      ceerw butyceerw butyVor 14 Tage
  • Congratulations 🎉👍

  • The brash destruction joly add because tuna tellingly complain notwithstanding a helpful smile. quizzical, bright nation

    one clickone clickVor 14 Tage
  • The dramatic club relevantly kiss because otter broadly scorch per a selfish aluminium. square, impolite temple

    Mayo GarlandMayo GarlandVor 14 Tage
  • pero tambien da la impresión que fue un lanzamiento controlado preparando algo a si como para un futuro aterrizaje esa son mis tres impresiones no se elucubro

    Manuel MartinManuel MartinVor 14 Tage
  • Comento : viendo lo bien me llama la atención la toma de este lanzamiento que alguien por favor me explique como se realizo esta toma que tipo de cámara se uso no se si existe tecnología para enfocar a tan larga distancia esta toma me hace recordar un programa de Tv de cuando era niño .( Thunderbirds Los Guardianes del Espacio ) que por cierto todo lo que allí emitían hoy día es una realidad ........................suspicacia

    Manuel MartinManuel MartinVor 14 Tage
  • Рогозин обосрался...

    Андрій ВолодимировичАндрій ВолодимировичVor 14 Tage
  • Who’s here after SN11 blew up mid-flip maneuver

    Jay PaintJay PaintVor 14 Tage
    • @Jay Paint That's better!

      XZenoRaptorXZenoRaptorVor 6 Tage
    • @XZenoRaptor Yeah that sounds a bit pessimistic. Let me fix that.

      Jay PaintJay PaintVor 6 Tage
    • mid-landing flip you mean

      Pol VallsPol VallsVor 13 Tage
    • It didn't blow up mid-flight...

      XZenoRaptorXZenoRaptorVor 14 Tage
  • Elon: NUCLEAR MISSILE COMIN' YOUR WAY!... Just kidding...

    ᛏᚤᚱᚠᛁᚾᚷᚱᛏᚤᚱᚠᛁᚾᚷᚱVor 14 Tage
    • a missile coming belly first?

      Pol VallsPol VallsVor 13 Tage
  • ...SpaceXtastic...!!!

    Ian MortonIan MortonVor 14 Tage
  • Shouldn't have launched sn11 in the fog, it was gonna blow up anyway even if the FTS didn't work. Welp sn15 here we come

    asterisKsasterisKsVor 14 Tage
    • Wether there was fog or not it doesn’t change anything.

      TimeProTimeProVor 10 Tage
    • That's what I said! And everyone went mental at me for calling SpaceX foolish as fuck for doing so. Completely rushed and wasted.

      Darth RevanDarth RevanVor 11 Tage
  • great achievement, the landing is awesome, but somehow i don't like those type of spaceships. I believe one day we will go into one piece of fully controlled spaceship :)

    DonDonVor 14 Tage
    • @Matt's DEhave stuff rather 500-1000y ;)

      DonDonVor 2 Tage
    • @Don Yes it's very interesting indeed. Perhaps we will see such technological advancements 50-100 years from now.

      Matt's Youtube stuffMatt's Youtube stuffVor 2 Tage
    • @Matt's DEhave stuff to travel to new stars also requires very high medical knowledge, Hybernation. if it will turn out no teleporation is possible (again quantum entanglement story) That quantum ental..... is imo one of the most important thing in whole science. Why it exists, what is that for? to carry mental state from dead body ? living after death in different dimention? We can't see any real connection of paired subparticules on distance, but maybe this is the effect of some processes from highe dimension. As scientist can't detect any even smallest fluctuation of anything during the process ,when changing state of 1st particular automatically change state of the other in time of ZERO at whatever distance. If I remember the latest test was performed at the distance of around 60kms or more. Although near death experience (NDE) happens only in our heads.... we cannot just say for 100% that it's due to processes in brain (very likely) but if we hear that those people could be in all places they want at the same time, that they even could tell what their family members (away) were doing while they were "out" of their bodies as they claim. Of course assuming that at least a few stories were real not just faked for any people can do a lot for money. ....selling stories etc. The most interesting is the case of neurosurgeon (not religiious one). What the nature uses that feature for. This is the most interesting thing for me in whole science...

      DonDonVor 2 Tage
    • @Don You are right, of course, we don't know the technological advancements that will occur well into the future. The sort of technology that helps engineer an SSTO vehicle will likely be used to travel to new stars.

      Matt's Youtube stuffMatt's Youtube stuffVor 2 Tage
    • @Matt's DEhave stuff nowadays impossible. Imagine getting energy from splitting atom ( a lot in atmosphere) on fly and later in space getting it from photons or other stuff, included magainzed energy from new kind of battery. Too early to even imagine how it may be in next 1000years. I bet the aim is not to carry too much fuel with the ship and that might be possible as you can get energy from anything.. what matters is to create proper devices which can do that. Also imagine that something might be hidden.. explain how works quantum entalngement... maybe we will be able to send small portions of energy if a source is millions kms away. If we can affect a state of an sub-atom particular on distance, that means a change. a change means that something happens if something happens you can get energy from there is no action without energy. to change something = energy rises... so why not to connect millions of the particles to set entanglement on on those packets and do something with that on distance ;) In space you only needs energy to change velocity and direction of you vehicle... landing or starting from planets different storry as you have a lot of particules in atmospheres you can use to get that energy

      DonDonVor 2 Tage
  • Yep, I knew it

    Syahrul RidzuanSyahrul RidzuanVor 14 Tage
  • High altitude ? ??? It's a rocket , ten kilometers ( six miles ) is not high . Germany was sending rockets that high in 1944 . 76 years and no progress ??? . And this is an empty rocket , load her up with fuel and life support systems and this tin can will never leave the launch pad . MARS has nothing to fear

    Neil McmacNeil McmacVor 15 Tage
    • @Neil Mcmac so you're stuck in the past considering you said you lived through the 60s and 70s. You're hated for Elon Musk also seems to be getting in the way of your good judgment if you ever had any. Starship and Saturn v are not comparable. We did not have real reusable rockets in the 40s quit making up shit.

      6969Vor 6 Tage
    • @Pol Valls dollars to doughnuts says Musk picks up and leaves town before any of his make believe rockets ever reach orbit . He is just suckling as many dollars out of the system that he can , or are you one of those morons that really believe Musk is using his own money . Lay off the drugs and try to think ahead a little , you load that tin can up with supplies, life support, crew quarters and extra engines and fuel to orbit and de-orbit and you have a disaster waiting to happen . Nothing but a pipe dream .

      Neil McmacNeil McmacVor 8 Tage
    • @Neil Mcmac falcon 9 landed at its 5th try and now it's the most reliable rocket. Starship had 4, and next prototype is full of new technologies successfully proven. Please, don't compare a mission to a test. The expectations are different, Saturn V was pioneering, Starship is so too. And Sn10 landed. SN11 tested advanced solutions, they learn from them and they will do the same, fly fail fix

      Pol VallsPol VallsVor 8 Tage
    • @Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez yeah it wasnt a good paragraph but you get the point that im trying to make. again, you said it very well

      IsaQuestIsaQuestVor 9 Tage
    • @IsaQuest because you don't learn anything if the damn thing is not balanced as it would be , or loaded as it would be . Musk is going ass backwards . Proving something that doesn't help him one little bit in the real world . Put weights in to make up for crew, fuel, live support . Now test it , Musk is testing on an empty can , the balance point will not be close to what a real ships balance would be ,,,,, so at the end of the day Musk has learned zero .

      Neil McmacNeil McmacVor 9 Tage
  • Give it a few more minutes

    haug0099haug0099Vor 15 Tage
  • whos here after sn11

    ToXiC_BigFatBabyToXiC_BigFatBabyVor 15 Tage
  • 🚀My rating: Starship SN8: 8/10 Starship SN9: 4/10 Starship SN10: 9/10 Starship SN11: 2/10 Gonna update my rating every time from now on.

    Latortuga 007Latortuga 007Vor 15 Tage
    • What is your rating based on? Level of excitement or what was achieved? I'm just curious as to how you gave SN11 a 2/10, you couldn't see a damn thing! lol I would argue that SN11 is an unfortunate 0/10 because of the fog, but from an engineering perspective a 10/10 because it helped them identify an issue that they need to fix for future missions.

      Matt's Youtube stuffMatt's Youtube stuffVor 2 Tage
    • @IsaQuest no.

      Pol VallsPol VallsVor 13 Tage
    • @TimePro the leaning was cool too

      Latortuga 007Latortuga 007Vor 14 Tage
    • SN9 I'd say would be also 9/10. They fixed the header tank issue that was present in SN8s flight.

      TimeProTimeProVor 14 Tage
    • @Starship SN10 ur welcome! ☺️

      Latortuga 007Latortuga 007Vor 14 Tage
  • Nutso!!lol...beautiful but nuts!!!congratulations to the whole team!!

    Armchair RevolutionaryArmchair RevolutionaryVor 15 Tage
  • I remember when these looked like grain silos

    EfloorEfloorVor 15 Tage
  • The trite market significantly harass because ship lilly glow without a empty history. wrong, depressed maraca

    Gerald WagnerGerald WagnerVor 15 Tage
  • didnt it explode a couple minutes after?

    Afri ColaAfri ColaVor 15 Tage
    • this is the test flight video, this is not the video of the entire recovery process

      Pol VallsPol VallsVor 13 Tage
    • it exploded 8 minutes later. but that's the fault of the landing legs,

      Roland B.Roland B.Vor 14 Tage
  • Who is here after SN11?

    tomer Ktomer KVor 15 Tage
    • me

      Pol VallsPol VallsVor 13 Tage
    • Me

      27ratri kongsanti27ratri kongsantiVor 15 Tage
    • me

      Jan ScampiJan ScampiVor 15 Tage